Allegation 08 Illustrated -
2 USC 285 Legislative Subversion

Some so-called "laws" have not completed ENACTMENT,

the legal process to become LAW.

​

“The other titles of the Code” deviate from “positive law”;

they “are prima facie [appear to be] evidence of the (NOT) laws”

contaminating OUR Library:

​

Prima facie:

At first glance: on initial examination or consideration;

​

Sufficient to establish a fact or raise a presumption

unless disproved or rebutted

​

Presumption: something believed without actual evidence:

​

a belief based on the fact that something is considered

to be extremely reasonable or likely

 

legal inference: an inference that something is the case,

in the absence of evidence rebutting that assumption

and on the basis of other known facts

 

belief in something that seems reasonable:

the acceptance that something is correct, without having proof of it,

on the grounds that it is extremely likely

 

A legal inference or assumption that a fact exists,

based on the known or proven existence of some other fact or group of facts

 

A presumption shifts the burden

of production or persuasion to the opposing party,

who can then attempt to overcome the presumption.

Black's Law Dictionary,

Seventh Edition © & (P) 2000 West Group,

All rights reserved

​

Presumptions derived from “appearance” (purposefully mislabeled “code”)

shift the burden of proof;

thereby creating presumption of correctness until proven wrong;

 thereby violating the basic concept of Unalienable Rights.

​

“When this project is completed, all the titles of the Code WILL BE LEGAL evidence …”.

​

WHEN the “other titles of the code” BECOME “enacted into positive law”,

THEN they “WILL BE LEGAL evidence”:

​

Enact: “Politics: to make proposed legislation into law”

 

Positive law: “irrefutable: conclusive and beyond doubt or question”

 

Refute: “to prove something to be false or somebody to be in error

through logical argument or by providing evidence to the contrary”

​

The Legislative Defendants’ “other titles of the code”

are ambiguous, mislabeled, NOT “enacted into positive law”,

and NOT “LEGAL EVIDENCE”.

​

They are Constitutionally non-compliant, incomplete, pending legislation

or misfiled Regulations manipulated into OUR Library posing as LAW, but unequivocally NOT LAW.

​

When viewing OUR Library’s entire USC content, all titles and subtitles

have orderly number and letter references

appearing to represent equal authority throughout

(Tacit Inclusion);

 however, each Title’s authority,

its most fundamental property,

is isolated, encoded, and buried in 2 USC 285

(Obscured limitations).

​

The Legislative Defendants’ presumptive “other titles”

coexist alongside “Positive Law” Titles

under OUR “general and permanent LAWS”;

thereby

impersonating “Positive Law” Titles,

falsifying Subject Matter Authority,

subverting OUR Constitution’s restrictions,

contaminating OUR Library,

and suborning illicit implementation and adjudication

​

(Allegations 09, 10, 11).

​

These “other Titles” belong in the section of OUR Library

designated Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),

carrying “presumptive” authority over specific federal “places”

and “subject entities” (soldiers, Government employees, corporations, etc.).

​

The Legislative Defendants’ 2 USC 285 procedures and ALL “other titles”

contaminate OUR Library of LAWS

with prima facia (appearance of LAW) Regulations;

​

 thereby disgracing

OUR Constitution, OUR Morality, and OUR global Reputation

by tacit inclusion (Omissive Fraud).

​

Their continued presence purporting equality to enacted "positive LAW"

suborns admiralty subjugation

endangering OUR SOVEREIGNTY, OUR “safety and happiness”.